COVID Shots' Synthetic Methylpseudouridine Can Cause Ribosomes to Misread the RNA's Instructions: Study (Nature)
More than a quarter of people injected with mRNA Covid jabs suffered an
unintended immune response created by a glitch in the way the vaccine was read
by the body, a study (published in Nature) has found.
No adverse effects were created by the error, data show, but Cambridge scientists found such vaccines were not perfect and sometimes led to nonsense proteins being made instead of the desired Covid “spike”, which mimics infection and leads to antibody production.
Research in the field, spanning decades, had been slow work. It often stalled because RNA itself is often attacked by the body as a foreign invader.
If you’re suffering from side effects, your first order of business is to eliminate the spike protein — and/or any aberrant off-target protein — that your body is producing. Two remedies shown to bind to and facilitate the removal of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein are hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. I don’t know if these drugs will work on off-target proteins as well, but it probably wouldn’t hurt to try.
The Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) has developed a post-vaccine treatment protocol called I-RECOVER. Since the protocol is continuously updated as more data become available, your best bet is to download the latest version straight from the FLCCC website at covid19criticalcare.com.
No adverse effects were created by the error, data show, but Cambridge scientists found such vaccines were not perfect and sometimes led to nonsense proteins being made instead of the desired Covid “spike”, which mimics infection and leads to antibody production.
mRNA jabs, such as the ones created by Moderna and Pfizer, use a string of
genetic material to tell the body to create a specific protein that safely
imitates an infection.
Research in the field, spanning decades, had been slow work. It often stalled because RNA itself is often attacked by the body as a foreign invader.
But in 2023, the Nobel Prize for Medicine went to the pair of scientists who had spent years working to fix the problem. It was done by taking
one of the RNA bases, uridine, and swapping in a very similar synthetic
alternative.
This breakthrough allowed scientists to create proteins in the body without the immune system attacking the jab.
It allows for quick and precise vaccines that are highly effective and was the backbone of the Covid vaccine response.
It was thought the minor tweak to uridine caused no problems in cells, but a team of researchers at the University of Cambridge’s Medical Research Council (MRC) Toxicology Unit have now found when this partially synthetic code is read, the protein-making machine in the body sometimes struggles with the uridine analogues.
It was thought the minor tweak to uridine caused no problems in cells, but a team of researchers at the University of Cambridge’s Medical Research Council (MRC) Toxicology Unit have now found when this partially synthetic code is read, the protein-making machine in the body sometimes struggles with the uridine analogues.
Because it is not a perfect fit for what is expected, there can be a momentary pause which causes the process to stutter and a letter in the code can get skipped, much like a bike slipping a gear.
This process, called frameshifting, throws out the way the code is interpreted as it relies on groups of three bases, known as codons, being read in the right order.
This process, called frameshifting, throws out the way the code is interpreted as it relies on groups of three bases, known as codons, being read in the right order.
This issue, caused by the jab’s code, throws the process completely out of sync and the entire subsequent code becomes garbled.
In the case of the Covid jabs, the end result is a nonsensical and harmless protein, the team found, which the body attacks and leads to an immune system flare-up. The December 6, 2023 study, published in Nature, found this occurred in around 25-30 per cent of people.
Rogue protein fear
The vaccine is read well enough to create the strong protection against the
coronavirus, the scientists say, but the frameshifting issue creates what
was, until now, an unknown off-target effect.
The code relating to the Covid vaccines was harmless and no issues were
created. However the team say that subsequent mRNA vaccines used for other
diseases or infections could, in theory, lead to viable proteins being
created that are active in the body.
In this scenario not only is the vaccine not making the right protein, it
could lead to a rogue protein being produced.
There is no evidence of this occurring in the Covid jabs, the authors
stress, and they say any trials on other mRNA therapeutics would detect any
such problems in early stages.
Dr James Thaventhiran, senior author of the report, said: “Research has
shown beyond doubt that mRNA vaccination against COVID-19 is safe. Billions
of doses of the Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines have been safely delivered,
saving lives worldwide.”
The authors also found that there is an easy way to eradicate the
frameshifting events which relies on changing the code of the mRNA drug to
minimise the use of the problematic pseudo-uridine.
Replacing it with a natural base that when read as a trio still makes the
correct amino acid is enough to stop the unwanted skips and therefore
improve safety without sacrificing efficacy.
These findings were shared with medicines regulator MHRA around a year ago,
the scientists say, and updated vaccines that use the improved form of mRNA
are in the works for cancer jabs, and other therapeutics.
‘Revolutionary technology’
“This technology is amazing and it’s going to be revolutionary as a new
medicine platform for all sorts of things, but we’ve just made it a whole
lot safer going forward,” Professor Anne Willis, Director of the MRC
Toxicology Unit told reporters.
“Ribosomes are somehow sensing the modified RNAs, but the Covid vaccines are
very, very safe and very, very efficacious.
“But there are decoding issues with this technology that can cause stalling
and frameshifting and we can get cellular immunity to these peptides after
vaccination.”
However, she adds it is very exciting that there is a way to fix the issue,
which “massively de-risks this platform going forward”.
Synthetic RNA Is Frequently Misread (In Layman English)
The inclusion of synthetic methylpseudouridine causes the ribosomes (which are responsible for reading the code) to misread the RNA’s instructions. RNA code consists of groups of three bases (codons) that must be read in the correct order for a desired protein to be created.
Because the methylpseudouridine is not a perfect fit, it causes the decoding process to stall and shift (hence the term “+1 ribosomal frameshifting”). There’s basically a stutter in the decoding process, as your cells don’t understand what’s being asked for, and this stuttering causes the decoding to skip a letter, thereby garbling the entire code.
As a result, unintended “nonsensical” proteins are produced instead of the desired SARS-CoV-2 spike. That, in turn, means that your immune system will not produce antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, but rather against these aberrant proteins.
According to the authors, off-target cellular immune responses occur in 25% to 30% of people who have received the COVID shot, and as noted by molecular virologist David Speicher Ph.D.:
“Whenever our cells create an abundance of unintended proteins or prevent production of appropriate proteins it could lead to an unintended immune response with a huge potential to cause harm.”
Not knowing exactly what proteins are being produced is far from the only problem with these gene-based shots, though.
Because the methylpseudouridine is not a perfect fit, it causes the decoding process to stall and shift (hence the term “+1 ribosomal frameshifting”). There’s basically a stutter in the decoding process, as your cells don’t understand what’s being asked for, and this stuttering causes the decoding to skip a letter, thereby garbling the entire code.
As a result, unintended “nonsensical” proteins are produced instead of the desired SARS-CoV-2 spike. That, in turn, means that your immune system will not produce antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, but rather against these aberrant proteins.
According to the authors, off-target cellular immune responses occur in 25% to 30% of people who have received the COVID shot, and as noted by molecular virologist David Speicher Ph.D.:
“Whenever our cells create an abundance of unintended proteins or prevent production of appropriate proteins it could lead to an unintended immune response with a huge potential to cause harm.”
Not knowing exactly what proteins are being produced is far from the only problem with these gene-based shots, though.
Resources for Those Injured by the COVID Jab
Data from across the world testify to a singular fact; that the COVID shots are the most dangerous drugs ever deployed. If you already got one or more COVID jabs and are now reconsidering, you’d be wise to avoid all vaccines from here on, as you need to end the assault on your body. Even if you haven’t experienced any obvious side effects, your health may still be impacted long-term, so don’t take any more shots.If you’re suffering from side effects, your first order of business is to eliminate the spike protein — and/or any aberrant off-target protein — that your body is producing. Two remedies shown to bind to and facilitate the removal of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein are hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. I don’t know if these drugs will work on off-target proteins as well, but it probably wouldn’t hurt to try.
The Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) has developed a post-vaccine treatment protocol called I-RECOVER. Since the protocol is continuously updated as more data become available, your best bet is to download the latest version straight from the FLCCC website at covid19criticalcare.com.
Pfizer must feel like it’s been one damned thing after another lately. In a year packed with horrible news for the jabs (not to mention poor jab recipients), yesterday saw a critical new discovery of jab problems, possibly the worst and most damning yet.
— Jeff Childers, Esq. (@jchilders98) December 7, 2023
How bad was it? It was… pic.twitter.com/t6si5QJKgU
Main source and reference: https://archive.ph/sJ3ic (The Telegraph)
This article is quite interesting and gives rise to hope for safe vaccines in the future.
ReplyDeleteHowever, the degree of insistence that the COVID vaccines are so completely safe while we see more and more serious side effects appearing, gives rise to suspicions that the research may be somewhat tainted by government or industry pressure.
This in no way detracts from the research that has been done by these scientists and does not detract from the possibilities in the future, but it is still a concern when one remembers the great lengths that the Biden administration went to to suppress the use of Ivermectin, found to be quite effective against COVID-19, even to the point of legal action, insisting, instead, that the new, untried, vaccines be used.
One must ask why this coercion was performed.